The “alphabet” derivatives-cds’s, mbs’s, etc.-were theoretically designed to spread credit risks among parties who were best able to bear that risk. In reality they brought about a financial crisis that may alter world power for decades. They have put the largest banks into actual, although disguised, insolvency (undeclared bankruptcy), have gutted American industry of capital, and incidentally put millions of Americans into poverty. What are these things and where do they come from?
“Derivatives” Defined
A “derivative” security is a legal right that is derived from some other right. Perhaps the most basic or familiar derivative is a stock “option.” Options come in two forms, “calls” and “puts.” A call is the right (but not the obligation) to buy something at a given price at some time in the future. A put is the right (but not the obligation) to sell someone else something at a given price at some time in the future. A simple example would be a stock call or put. If you think IBM stock is going to gain value, you can buy a call option. As the stock price goes up, so does the value of the call option. If the price of the stock goes down, so does the value of the call option. But options are much less expensive in general than the underlying stocks. It might cost you $200 to buy the right to buy 100 shares of IBM at $120 a month from now, whereas the cost of the stock itself would be $11,000 (assuming a price of $110 per share of IBM stock). So you can control more stock with less money through options.
Controlling more stock with less money is financial “leverage. It’s like using a megaphone: a small change in the stock price creates a large profit for the owner of the option. Under the right circumstances, a little money can turn into a lot of money in a short time with options.
Stock call and put options make a lot of sense. If you own the stock and want to insure against the possibility of it going down in value, you can buy a put option. At the end of the day, for a cost of a few dollars per share you can protect against a sudden wipe-out of an account’s value. If you happen to be managing someone else’s money this makes a lot of sense for everybody. On the other side of that equation, someone sells a put, signifying a willingness to purchase the stock if it goes down to a given price. For IBM, to continue the example, this might also make excellent sense. Buying and selling calls allows parties to divide up the future potential of a rising stock so that they can adjust their risks in a rational way.
Alphabet Derivatives-Some Background
The alphabet derivatives were clothed with the same rationality as stock derivatives and posed as a means to allow financial interests to split up the costs of financing the housing boom that developed in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Let us start with the way houses have been traditionally purchased. Mr. Jones would find a house he liked and negotiate a price with Mr. Smith, the seller. After arriving at a price, Mr. Jones would then seek financing from a savings and loan or bank. The bank would have the house appraised and offer to lend Mr. Jones some of the price. Mr. Jones would, in the old days, have had to come up with 10 or 20% of the purchase price and would borrow the rest. The bank would have taken actions to protect itself-it required Mr. Jones to come up with a certain amount of money (establishing some “equity” in case of foreclosure and incidentally proving his creditworthiness), and it examined the appraisal to make sure the house was actually worth the money spent (so that if it had to foreclose it could get its money back by selling the house).
That kind of careful banking protected the purchaser, the bank, and the general market. But it did make it hard for people with less money, who couldn’t afford the large down-payment, to purchase a house. Of course the banks could not have cared less about that, but politicians did-they saw it as a means to improve the lives of their constituents. What the banks did care about, though, was making more money. For various reasons, the interest rates on money were being held down in the late 1990s (through the present), and it began to be difficult for banks to make the kind of money they wanted simply by lending money in the traditional way. They needed leverage.
The “Rest” of the Story
The reason interest rates were so low was that the government was holding them down. At the same time, the federal government was also creating vast new amounts of dollars to fund huge government deficits and trade imbalances. This was causing “fixed assets” like houses to “inflate” in price, and thus was born the housing bubble. Over a lengthy period of time houses steadily went up in value 5% or more per year.
A mortgage loan, which enables a purchaser to buy a whole house for a fraction of its cost down is a form of leverage. If you make a $5,000 down-payment on a $100,000 house, and the house gains 5% in value in a year to $105,000, you have doubled your equity. Your house is worth $105,000, but you only owe $95,000 (without even having made a payment). If it goes up another 5% the following year, your house is worth a little over $110,000, but you still owe only $95,000 (still without even having made a payment).
Since houses “always” went up from year to year, banks found themselves needing less and less of a down-payment to protect themselves against foreclosure. Refinancing became popular as a way for the house-owners to remove some of the equity of their houses to let them buy things they otherwise could not afford.
And all the financing activity associated with houses meant that banks needed a faster way to make loans and get their money back. And thus were born the alphabet derivatives.
First came the mbses-mortgage backed securities. Mortgage backed securities are basically bonds: they are a right for the owner to receive payments over time (the mortgage payments at the interest rate charged by the banks), and if an individual house owner could not make payments, the bond was protected by being able to foreclose on the house. Since the government was giving banks money at 1% interest, and the banks were charging 5 or more percent interest to the house buyers, the banks made a lot of money on the mortgages. The mbs’s allowed the bank to turn around and sell those mortgages to somebody else, get their money back out of the deal and lend it again. And again. The banks made a lot of money on this scheme, and because of the nature of the monetary system (“fractional reserve”), they were super-leveraged.
The question became, how to find large enough sources of money to keep funding the mbs’s. In a way, that was easy. The best source of money for any hare-brained scheme is retirement funds, also known as everybody’s “pigeon.” Retirement funds have a lot of money, the beneficiaries are vulnerable, and the money managers seem to be remarkably careless. But many investment funds were required by law to invest only in particularly safe funds. They could buy bonds, but only tripleA-rated bonds.
Not every house buyer is triple-A-rated. And during the latter stages of the housing bubble, as politicians wanted more home-owners, banks wanted to sell more houses, and the funding for the houses shifted from careful local bankers to careless retirement administrations, the quality of the risk of the mortgages slipped, to say the least. Those were the days of “liar loans,” where nobody checked even to see if the loan applications contained true information, much less made any real evaluation of the purchaser’s creditworthiness.
So how to make sure the pigeons could end up with the mbs’s? That’s where credit default swaps (“cds’s”) were born. A credit default swap, as it was developed, is simply a form of money-laundering. A large entity (primarily AIG) insures, or guarantees the loans making up a mortgage backed security. In theory, in other words, any time a home-owner was going to miss a payment, AIG would be right there to make up the difference. Because AIG had an triple-A rating, the mbs’s it guaranteed simply took that rating, too. That allowed the bankers to shift vast quantities of the mbs-related risk onto the shoulders of their pigeons, the old and infirm. No one really checked to see how many cds’s AIG was issuing…
Next time you hear about the elderly struggling to make ends meet, consider how the bankers bilked them of hundreds of billions of dollars. The bail-outs protected the banks from any consequences of their actions and further enriched them.
Draw your own conclusions.
You can get a lot of help, much of it free, from my website at: http://yourlegallegup.com. Or please take a look at a brief video presentation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zT60kiHn8G8
Kenneth H. Gibert.
I Received a J.D. from Washington University Law School in 1989 and practiced law in St. Louis city and county (federal, state and local courts) for almost fifteen years, the last several of which were focused almost exclusively on debt litigation.
I founded my websites in response to this opportunity. My mission is to protect ordinary people from being taken advantage of by the debt collectors.
Author: Kenneth Gibert
Article Source: EzineArticles.com

